Mike Florio, known for his knack for generating controversy even in the absence of it, recently penned an article that raised eyebrows. In this particular case, Florio’s article suggested that the Philadelphia Eagles might entertain the idea of trading Jalen Hurts.

While it’s not entirely impossible for the Eagles to trade Hurts, there’s been no concrete indication from the team that they are actively considering such a move.

Florio’s argument centers around the notion that Hurts’ contract could make this process “fairly simple” for the Eagles.

However, delving deeper into the details, it becomes evident that the simplicity may be overstated.

Any potential trade would require another NFL team to not only part with significant draft capital but also shoulder the financial burden of Hurts’ contract. Moreover, Hurts himself would need to waive his no-trade clause to initiate the trade in the first place.

Considering these intricate factors, it becomes clear that labeling this potential trade as “fairly simple” might be an oversimplification of the situation. The complexities involved in trading a star quarterback like Jalen Hurts make it a less straightforward endeavor than Florio’s article might suggest.

Let’s also be honest. The Philadelphia Eagles are not going to be trading Jalen Hurts. Even suggesting that idea is a bit ludicrous.

Want the latest NFL and NCAA Football analysis, breaking news, and insider information? Click here. Interested in reading storylines and analysis about the NBA? Check out our partner NBA Analysis Network.